Now that the BiblioBlog Rankings …


suck and should die, I suppose I should say a few words.  I don’t think that’s the case.  In fact, I think that what the BiblioBlog rankings really need is more cowbell:

I will try to add a cowbell track to the next set of rankings that I post.

Now, that’s funny no matter who you are!  Okay.  Now that I hope you’ve had a good laugh, you can go back to your debating.


14 responses to “Now that the BiblioBlog Rankings …”

  1. if you want to do the list you should do the list. if you ever stop doing something (or start doing something) just because of someone else’s opinion, you’ve ceased to be a person and become a tool. you dont want to be a tool do you jer?

    if folk like what you do- well and good. if not- so what?

  2. Sorry, folks if you didn’t get to see the video before. I thought I posted it correctly but it was messed up.

    Mike: Now there’s a debate I could be involved in. But, my favorite is here – http://vodpod.com/watch/1830741-will-ferrell-axis-of-evil

    D: I hope to visit in December granted if the testing goes well and I can finish an introduction and conclusion.

    Jim: Is that a trick question?

    • J. K.,
      Oddly enough you can Google stuff like that and actually get a result:
      [plus sign][forward slash][apostrophe][backslash]

      Anyway, I’ll give it a try +/’

  3. Bitsy: True, but I was going for the real deal.

    Jim: Btw, I have taken over the rankings because I enjoy doing them. At the very least they give me a very prominent place to give Joel a friendly reminder of just how lame he is.

  4. You know, simply because I don’t comment, doesn’t mean I don’t read it. Or Google my name endlessly to see what others are same.

    Sticks and stones, Jeremy, rubber and glue.